Talk:Deep web
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Deep web article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days ![]() |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Iceberg chart
[edit]Seriously? High importance article, level-5 vital article in technology and it includes a poorly made highly scientific "iceberg chart". It adds no value whatsoever to the article and simplifies the subject to such extent that its incorrect. 80.98.26.97 (talk) 18:37, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- I was just about to make the same point. A better alternative would be something that explains how web crawlers or web spiders work. What do you think? MystikMakr (talk) 13:01, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- In particular, it makes the common mistake of conflating the deep web and the dark web, something the article itself addresses. Messelastur (talk) 16:48, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- I've removed the image as it's seriously misleading. Having a diagram on the page would still be helpful though, but I'll let someone else decide what that should be. DigammaOrGamma (talk) 09:40, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Need fixed matches here
[edit]Today fixed matches display 2C0F:FE38:2216:1633:CC90:D09E:7FF9:505F (talk) 14:12, 6 September 2024 (UTC)