User talk:Male1979

Welcome to my talk page. Please post new messages at the bottom, and use descriptive headlines when starting new topics (Leave message). Thank you.

Remember the spirit of WikiLove.

Archive 1 - Feb. 11, 2005 - August 18, 2005

Nuclear power phase-out

Why do yoy propose these countries? They are not even considering nuclear phase out. --Trigor 08:47, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

Answered at Talk:nuclear power phase-out. Ben ^T/_C 08:54, August 19, 2005 (UTC)

Marcel Duchamp

Hey again Sparky. Just wanted to say your Duchamp article looks pretty good. Ben ^T/_C 05:56, August 18, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks, Ben! It looks like it might be rather long. Though, I think I'll make a separate article for readymades. Most of the Duchamp images will likely be deleted from wiki soon, since they're on commons as public domain.

BTW: the "art factor" we discussed earlier... check out The Creative Act by Marcel Duchamp. (1957)

>>sparkit|TALK<< 17:38, August 19, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the link. I just read it. So it was "art coefficient" and not "art factor." I found the text at the installation in Yokohama a bit more inspiring than that text though.

I had some free time to thoroughly read the Duchamp article and some of the "sub"-articles (a lot of which you created I noticed). I had a very good time.

The article is not that long as you say. I saw you have still a lot of material you want to add about Chess playing, readymades, etc. I think it's only getting more interesting and if it gets too long that's what wikilinks are there for, right?

I found it extremely interesting to read about the speculations that his readymades were not really readymade. If that's the case and he didn't tell anybody then it's really a great joke! I put the image of Da Vinci's Mona Lisa next to his Mona Lisa in the Duchamp article. They differ a lot actually. Please do more readymade articles, if you can. I want to read about Mona Lisa (Duchamp).

BTW, please wikify your contribution page. You make it hard for people who actually want to read what you wrote.

Ben ^T/_C 05:41, August 20, 2005 (UTC)

Yes, there is a lot more to add to the article and readymades will definitely be a separate article. Thanks for your interest and support! >>sparkit|TALK<< 15:19, August 23, 2005 (UTC)

Nuclear energy policy

Hello

Thank you for your comment about Nuclear "phase out" copying to nuclear energy policy. First of all I would like to explain myself. All in all two paragraphs have been copied to nuclear policy article. One is part about Netherlands. I copied it because old one was just an old version of nuclear phase out paragraph that I updated and moved to policy page. I do believe that that article is good for energy policy. I think that that one is an exception. For example it would be wrong to move Sweden as article on policy page deals with several aspects. Not just phase out. I felt that Netherlands paragraph could be moved there.

Second one was about nuclear security. Security standard. Again it was copy of old version from nuclear phase out or vice versa. That one can apply to both articles. In other words arguments against phase out and for nuclear are more the less the same. Same goes for vice versa. That is not truth however for other parts of the article.

--Trigor 11:51, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

Ok, I see your changes make sense.

I am under pressure of people who want to merge and split the two articles all the time so I am very cautious to keep them apart a little, though they have to be written more or less in parallel, with different foci - not an easy task. My idea was to have all the info first in nuclear power phase-out and then move relevant parts to nuclear energy policy and summarize them in nuclear power phase-out. Ben ^T/_C 05:07, August 23, 2005 (UTC)

Hi Ben. I meant notify you about this the other week (but forgot) - Four Corners, a reputable Australian Broadcasting Corporation series, had a programme on nuclear energy, or specifically, the contrasting debates about it in Sweden and Australia. You should check the "Who's Afraid of Nuclear Power?" transcript. It might be of some assistance. Happy editing, --Cyberjunkie | Talk 06:38, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

Karl Kraus

Hi! I noticed that the Karl Kraus english page is really poor, while the german one it way better. I think this huge author deserves more, can you translate some of it? I'm starting to work to the italian version, but I can't speak German. --Mauro 22:41, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

I put some more. Ben ^T/_C 18:25, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

link to scale

At scale space you created one or more links to scale. Since scale is (as you would of course expect) a disambiguation page, it would be better to link to one of the articles listed on that page. Michael Hardy 23:18, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the hint. I changed the links so they point now to more appropriate articles. Ben ^T/_C 00:35, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

{{unreferenced}}

Thank you for adding a related book to article on Ukiyo-e, however, there is a difference between references - which as been used to provide facts for the article - and further reading, which has not. See Wikipedia:Cite sources for more information.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 03:39, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your comment, Piotrus. I am not sure, whether it is right to just search for some references (and on-line in amazon.com what is more) as I have done. However, the Wikipedia:Cite_your_sources guide is not completely clear about it. On one side (from the word) references are from where you cite. Then (on the other side), references are where other people can verify the information, similar to external links, but not the same (do you agree on the two meanings?). With this latter sense in mind I put the book as a reference. I also think I saw this practice with some other article (forgot where). A problem is, conceded, I don't know the book. But then, I think, the information in the article is general enough to be found in nearly any book on the topic (and the book I put seemed reasonable enough). What do you say? Ben ^T/_C 11:30, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

I admit I was once confused as well, and added sources to references without actually reading them. Now I know better, and I try to teach others that there is a difference. A source which may contain useful info, but has - to the best of one's knowledge - not been used in the article, should go either to 'Further reading' or 'External links' (or 'See also'). 'References' is only for sources that have been cited in the article, and the best practice is to link the relevant facts from main body to the reference via Wikipedia:Footnotes.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 16:01, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Piotrus, you wrote:

A source which may contain useful info, but has - to the best of one's knowledge - not been used in the article, should go either to 'Further reading' or 'External links' (or 'See also').

Leaving the concrete case aside (where I even don't know the source), the guidlines in Wikipedia:Cite_your_sources are not that strict: (citing)

In general, even if you are writing from memory, you should actively search for authoritative references to cite. If you are writing from your own knowledge, then you should know enough to identify good references that the reader can consult on the subject — you will not be around forever to answer questions. The main point is to help the reader and other editors.

I don't want to argue about the specific article (ukiyoe), but I want to get this straight for me personally (and I think it is very important for your project also). I hope you don't mind my insisting. Thank you. Ben ^T/_C 17:31, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

I guess rules may need some improvement. My rule of thumb is if you are pretty sure it is a good reference, explaining most of the issues of the article, you can add it even if you had just read the abstract. Google Print is pretty helpful here. However, as I wrote above, what we should idealy strive for is referencing every fact with footnotes (but I realize it is quite impossible now, so I am adding this tag to the articles lacking sources, not those lacking footnoted sources). With educating you about our references and you adding this book to ukiyo-e, my effort has already paid off somewhat :)--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 17:47, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Hmmm. I agree with what you said about footnotes. As for ukiyoe, I'll hope we'll find a book. I will search some more. I wish you success with the project. It is surely worthwhile. Thanks for the clarification. Ben ^T/_C 21:00, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Regarding Neural Networks organisation

Hello there, I saw your edit and comment and so I was wondering what is your opinion on the current Neural Networks article. I made some improments (I hope) recently - and I added as extensive sections as I dared on neural networks in AI-related applications and on the modelling of real neural systems. Do you think I should remove some of the AI related stuff from this article and move it over to ANNs? --Olethros 23:37, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

I think the article should be not much more than a disambiguation between artificial and biological neural networks (the reviewer from nature was probably ignorant about wikipedia and the artificial neural network article, he was supposed to review instead). The article could contain something about the history of ANNs and a comparison between artificial neural networks and neural networks, nothing more. IMHO, the article now contains far too much technical information about ANNs that belong in the ANN article.

I think your edits were very helpful in clarifying the language, shortening the paragraphs, and adding references. :) --Ben ^T/_C 12:59, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Culture of Asia

Hi, I saw some of your minor edits, which were better than the major ones (smiles). Please continue to up-date the edits, particularly done by me. Thanks. --Bhadani 14:52, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Comment about popup disambiguation

Hi Male1979. This is Male 1977 (older, so you better listen :) I have a question about this edit. I think there is a bug in the code you use, as there is no reason as far as I can tell to insert an underscore in links. Wonder what you think. You can reply here. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 19:51, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Hi Oleg. I just saw it. Doesn't make any sense. I have to check the script's suggestions more thoroughly in the future. I'll post the author. Thanks. Ben ^T/_C 13:16, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

OK, thanks. :) Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 16:28, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Winnetou

Hi Ben. Thanks for your kind words. Just finished reading the third volume of the book so tried to read/fix related articles. Yes, I am mosty active on bg:. Keep up the good work. --5ko (85.169.40.112) 16:19, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Map of japanese nuclear power plants.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Map of japanese nuclear power plants.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Matt 11:05, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

I see you got it from ja.wikipedia.org, but it would be better if you could state where they got it from. Most users on en don't understand japanese, so if you're able to get the authorship information from that site it would be a great help. Matt 11:07, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Nuclear Energy

		The E=MC² Barnstar
		Thanks for your work on Nuclear energy and trying to keep NPOV alive. Jfingers88 22:34, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Tanzania

Where'd you get the info on the history of Tanzania from? It seems like a huge addition to the main page. Most main pages of countries that I have seen have short history sections. I was just wondering if it would be O.K. to move the information to the History of Tanzania page. Thanks! Darth Panda 02:06, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Map_kanagawa_odawara_city_p01-01.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Map_kanagawa_odawara_city_p01-01.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 07:33, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Asia minor roman power.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Asia minor roman power.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Tawker 05:28, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Please read the courtesy statement (as per Wikipedia:Public_domain_resources#History) on the upload page, before you tag a file as violation of copyright next time. It is public domain. Ben ^T/_C 05:35, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, there are way too many images on the list and it's hard to verify each one, hence the request for the tag by the uploader. Again, thanks for your prompt reply. Tawker 05:44, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Tiger

Hi Ben,

I was reading on nuclear powers where I saw you have contributed a lot and wanted to praise you for your good work, but later decided to delete it. Are you an expert on the issue? You seem like you know a lot on this subject.

I am new with Wikipedia, just learning, I would like to contribute also in some topics, will see.

Me.. I am a college student at the Georgetown Uni., living in Alexandria, Virginia, majoring International Business, you?

Keep up the good work.

Tiger

Karl May

Interresting ... althaugh that is probably a question of the scope of that category.

Are you involved with the cs wiki? It looks like they have a lot of Karl May related pictures. Agathoclea 19:39, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

sensory substitution

It seems you originated the subject article.

A bit of history: in 1963 I worked for Carter Collins at the Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute as did a young (then) Dr. Paul Bach-y-Rita, whom you credit with the TVSS.

I moved on to the development of the RIAS (Remote Infrared Audible Signage) and remember our excitement at starting with what clearly was a flawed premise in the area of sensory substitution. There were numerous devices before and since all of which have a mistaken set of assumptions about sensation.

However from the POV of a wikipedia editor I thought you might be interested in that history.

Love.

Answered at User talk:Love26. Ben ^T/_C 12:30, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Munich

Hello,

You are invited to join WikiProject Munich!

There are a lot of things to do in this project. From creating new articles to finetuning articles into featured article status.

How can you help?

• You can join a Task Force.
• You can help comform Munich-related articles to Wikipedia Policy.
• You can get free Munich-related images under GNU Free Documentation License.
• You can create and edit of Munich-related articles.
• You can do translations from German Wikipedia to English Wikipedia on Munich-related articles.
• You can help do assessments of Munich-related articles.
• You can help expand articles currently in the Stub-class and Start-class.
• You can help reference articles.
• Since original research is against Wikipedia policy, you can research topics to expand. This means you don't need to know anything about Munich.
• You can help expand stubs and start-class articles and help finetune other articles into Featured article status.

A WikiProject of this nature is very broad. Munich has a rich history in sports, culture, politics along with many more topics. Feel free to help out in your area of interest.

If you want to check the project out you can click the link above. If you want to join the project, you can sign up here.

If you have any questions feel free to contact myself or any other member of the project.

Request on Zatoichi talk page for an explanation of your recent edit

I don't know if you're watching the page, but in case you're not, a user has [Talk:Zatoichi#his_trade|asked] for an explanation of why you changed "masseur" to "bone setter" in that article. Do you think you could pop over there and reply? — Haeleth Talk 12:09, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Your edit on my User page

I appreciate the intention and I realize it was a tiny edit, but please do not make edits like that on User pages. It is permissible to do things like fix links. I sometimes will disambiguate a link or make a link direct on a User page, and a couple of times I have corrected factual errors involving me. However, in general, a User's page is their own, within broad limits. Rarely, users might post illegal things on their User pages or post attacks against other users or groups of people, and these have to be removed, usually by an Administrator. In the specific case here, I reverted your edit because an article can't appear on the Main page, they are too large, so only small entries from them or links to them appear. I note that your User page uses almost identical wording to that which you changed on mine, i.e. "the entry". Hu 21:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Untagged image

An image you uploaded, Image:Sofia gerb.png, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 01:02, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Hitler and Siebengebirge

You're the one who worked on both Adolf Hitler and Siebengebirge. Can you answer a question for me? Do you know if A. Hitler ever attached significance to the Seven Hills near Linz, as a comparison to the seven hills of Rome? I've heard that he wanted to turn Linz, Austria into a new Rome and cultural capital of Europe. I'm trying to track down if there was a connection there. If you have any information on this, it would be appreciated..64.48.134.17 19:02, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

You're right that I worked on both articles, but if there exists such a connection that you describe, I have no idea about it. I can only point you to Welthauptstadt Germania as new German capital and cultural center. --Ben ^T/_C 22:55, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. That article is about Berlin, though, not Linz. The Linz article includes a couple lines about how Hitler wanted to rebuild Linz and make it into a cultural center. It doesn't mention the hills, though.

If Hitler could see that modern art museum at the bottom of the page, he'd probably spin in his grave. :)

Interesting fact about Linz. I couldn't care less about his ashes, though. --Ben ^T/_C 09:26, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Adriane Knoppix nominated for deletion

Hi. This looks like a good topic, but it lacks significant sources to demonstrate notability per WP:N. I looked through search engine results and could not find enough info. to make a case for a keep. Maybe you can. Good luck. --Kevin Murray 13:31, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Germany Invitation

Hello, Male1979! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be. Wikipedia:WikiProject Germany | watch Wikipedia:German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board | watch

--Zeitgespenst (talk) 22:55, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Victoria of the United Kingdom

Hi, I've made a follow-up to your comments on Talk:Victoria of the United Kingdom. – Toon^(talk) 00:49, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of FreeMat

An article that you have been involved in editing, FreeMat, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FreeMat. Thank you. Schuym1 (talk) 02:35, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:International terrorist incidents.gif

File:International terrorist incidents.gif is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:International terrorist incidents.gif. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:International terrorist incidents.gif]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:25, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Male1979! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 331 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Anne Treisman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 11:26, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Warren G. Harding

I made changes to the Warren G. Harding paragraph in the opening you had concern over. You can look to see if you approve. Cmguy777 (talk) 04:43, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

I made more changes to the article's opening with your suggestions in the talk page. Cmguy777 (talk) 19:20, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Your input in the article helped with the editing. Cmguy777 (talk) 03:15, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

It's been a pleasure. Thanks to you for your hard work to improve articles! Ben ^T/_C 14:29, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Tokyo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Tokyo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:39, 12 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —innotata 17:39, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 21:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Fang mich doch Du Eierloch

Hallo Hansjörgwilhelm,

ich habe gesehen dass du den Artikel Kinderreim angefangen hast. Vielleicht interessiert dich auch die ausführliche Diskussion hier: [1]--Salino01 08:17, 4. Jun. 2011 (CEST)

Übertrag von der deutschen Wikipedia-Seite--Salino01 (talk) 21:54, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Slavery in Poland

Thanks for your interest in the article and kind words at Talk:Slavery in Poland. You may want to join our Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland, where we can always use more hands. English native speakers and copyeditors are always very welcome, as many of our articles are written by non-native speakers like myself. If you like reviewing articles, we do have an active B-class review section: Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland/Reviews (after a B-class review, the articles are likely to go to WP:GAN). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 15:34, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Ave, Prokonsul, thanks for your message. I liked the topic and the writing. I might consider looking at some articles from time to time. Cheers. Ben ^T/_C 17:55, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Computational vision

I spotted this - I'd just emptied the Category:Stubs and it was there next time I looked - and have upgraded that reference and fiddled around variously.

A comment: I went to your user page out of curiosity, and had to waste a few thought processes on:

• "Oh there's an orange bar, I've got a message"
• "No, it's just saying 'Leave a message'"
• "******".

Could you do us all a favour and change it to another colour? PamD 11:10, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Tokyo topo 1977.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Tokyo topo 1977.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:11, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

An RfC that you may be interested in...

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Tokyo topo 1977.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Tokyo topo 1977.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 03:09, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

J.A. Pizzi - Reply

Hi there M'79, AL from Portugal "speaking",

i "defend" myself: ideally, we should have just two main sections in a player/manager storyline. If you go with CLUB CAREER and INTERNATIONAL CAREER, then coaching stuff should be inserted in whichever is the situation (a guy could be coaching a club, or a national team).

You could, however, opt by going with PLAYING CAREER and COACHING (or MANAGER) CAREER, in that way we always have two sections instead of three. Regards, happy editing --AL (talk) 13:05, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nautilus Pompilius (band)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nautilus Pompilius (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KDS4444^Talk 09:45, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Nautilus Pompilius (band) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nautilus Pompilius (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nautilus Pompilius (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444^Talk 09:34, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Tokyo topo 1977.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tokyo topo 1977.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:46, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Male1979. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

British civil war listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect British civil war. Since you had some involvement with the British civil war redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 16:50, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Male1979. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Male1979. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Heute in Plankstadt

Hi, der Artikel um den es für :de geht, ist TOID, hat aber null Eile. Zu Loveholidays gibts bei :en noch keinen, insofern vermag ich nicht einzuschätzen, ob der auf :de die Relevanzhürde schaffen würde. Es gibt die Category:Hotels bzw Kategorie:Hotel und, nur bei :de, zusätzlich die Kategorie:Hotelbau. Mein Artikel zum einzigen Parish in London ist Queen’s Park (City of Westminster). Wenn ich es mal nach London schaffe, will ich mir das auch mal anschauen. Soviel fürs erste. Kallewirsch (talk) 13:04, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Immer essen? Dead Men Don't Wear Plaid!

The game from my childhood is Mille Bornes CU Kallewirsch (talk) 22:04, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Normal conditions

The article Normal conditions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a dictionary - there are no indications that this is any sort of well-defined concept in any field of study, "normal conditions" is just a phrase people like to use in a variety of different contexts.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - car chasm (talk) 06:23, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Very much appreciate the deletion. This was my attempt to see how effective the review process is. Ben ^T/_C 17:04, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

"Balon de Oro" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Balon de Oro has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23 § Balon de Oro until a consensus is reached. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 10:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)