Jump to content

Talk:Nobelium

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleNobelium has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 9, 2014Good article nomineeListed
September 29, 2014Good topic candidatePromoted
February 15, 2024Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 8, 2014.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the discoveries of nobelium and lawrencium were disputed between Soviet and American scientists for decades?
Current status: Good article

Untitled

[edit]

Article changed over to new Wikipedia:WikiProject Elements format by mav 07:44, 24 Jan 2004 (UTC). Elementbox converted 12:11, 17 July 2005 by Femto (previous revision was that of 06:34, 21 June 2005).

Information Sources

[edit]

Some of the text in this entry was rewritten from Los Alamos National Laboratory - Nobelium. Additional text was taken directly from the Elements database 20001107 (via dict.org), Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) (via dict.org) and WordNet (r) 1.7 (via dict.org). Data for the table were obtained from the sources listed on the subject page and Wikipedia:WikiProject Elements but were reformatted and converted into SI units.


Talk

[edit]

No258,260

[edit]

If you check out the isotopes of Mendelevium, it can be seen that Md258,260 have a non-negligible chance of decaying into No258,260. 32ieww (talk) 22:53, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they do. Are you suggesting any changes to the article? Double sharp (talk) 03:09, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nobelium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:46, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reaction with ammonia

[edit]

I believe nobelium metal behaves similarly to ytterbium metal and the alkaline earth metals, dissolving in ammonia to form blue electride salts. Sometimes Mendelevium may also be able to form electride salts. Anoop Manakkalath (talk) 22:49, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you're proposing this as an addition to the article, do you have a source for verification? Nobelium (and mendelevium) cannot be produced in macroscopic quantities, so I don't see how the formation of blue electride salts could be discerned. Complex/Rational 05:10, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Based on periodicity I agree that this is likely for nobelium (Cm-No seem quite similar to La-Eu), but without a source it does not belong in the article. Double sharp (talk) 14:54, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]