Jump to content

User talk:DopefishJustin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello Dopefish, welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Drop us a note at the new user log so that we can meet you and help you get started. If you need editing help, visit Wikipedia:How does one edit a page. For format questions, visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the village pump.


You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.


Again, welcome! I love your creative name :-). ugen64 23:16, Mar 23, 2004 (UTC)

Hmm, I always thought this nick was unoriginal, but thanks! DopefishJustin 00:03, Mar 24, 2004 (UTC)

Keen5.png

[edit]

Hiya. It seems that I accidentally deleted Keen5.png in addition to the JPEGs I was supposed to delete. :/ I'm sorry about that. I'm glad you said you had the file still, so you can re-upload it. Thanks. — Timwi 20:27, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

It's reuploaded now, so no harm done. I guess I'll try to make my listings clearer in the future :) DopefishJustin 21:39, May 3, 2004 (UTC)

Bread clips

[edit]

Hurrah for bread clips! Good job fleshing out that stub. - TB 22:13, 11 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Why I reverted

[edit]

Justin - H-anime is a an abbreviated form of Hentai. According to the rules for naming categories, category names are supposed to be descriptive, and thus Hentai is preferable.

Also, the term "Hentai" is orders of magnitude more popular and recognized. It gets 500 times as many google hits - 22,100,000 to 43,000. →Raul654 21:13, May 31, 2004 (UTC)

"H" is not exactly an abbreviation of "hentai" (see hentai), but fine. It does need to have "anime" in it, though, because we probably want categories for manga and games at some point. DopefishJustin (・∀・) 21:38, 31 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Justin, I posted my suggestion for placement of disambiguation links to Wikipedia_talk:Disambiguation, as you proposed.
Jorge Stolfi 05:31, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Why circumflexes instead of macrons are seen in Shonen Jump articles

[edit]

Justin, articles relating to Viz' Shonen Jump use circumflexes instead of macrons because Viz uses circumflexes instead of macrons to mark long vowels in Shonen Jump. Therefore, for articles that are about Shonen Jump manga, circumflexes are used there. WhisperToMe 08:04, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)

I don't particularly care what Viz does; this is Wikipedia, not Shonen Jump. I also don't happen to know offhand every series that runs in the English Shonen Jump. I won't bother redoing stuff that's been reverted though. DopefishJustin (・∀・) 00:34, Jul 14, 2004 (UTC)
The main reason is that "proper noun"s on Shonen Jump often have the circumflex used. A few examples that have Wikipedia articles:
However, Viz can be inconsistent with using them, so not all instances of a said name WILL have the circumflex. But if it has an instance, it should be used. WhisperToMe 20:52, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Edit attribution

[edit]

Hi Justin. The edit from your IP has now been reattributed to your username. Regards Kate Turner | Talk 00:26, 2004 Sep 5 (UTC)

Thank you for your contribution to one, or more, articles that are now organized under Data management.

Because of your previous intrest, you are recieving an invitation to become a founding member of the Data Management Wiki Committee.

The members, of course, will form and solidify the purpose, rules, officers, etc. but my idea (to kick things off) is to establish a group of us who will take responsiblity to see that the ideas of Data management are promoted and well represented in Wikipedia articles.

If you are willing to join the committee, please go to Category_talk:Data_management and indicate your acceptance of this invitation by placing your three tilde characters in the list.

KeyStroke 01:22, 2004 Sep 25 (UTC)

Article Licensing

[edit]

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Warez

[edit]

thanx. Rickyrab | Talk 20:35, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sandra Hess

[edit]

Hi! Thank you for letting me know about the issue. I'm pretty new in Wikipedia and just thought of contributing a little. I've considered your suggestions and have edited the pages.

Doujinshi

[edit]

Doujinshi gets 14 times as many hits in Google compared to Dojinshi. I think this is probably enough to be an "accepted romanization". Let me know what you think. Ashibaka (tock) 03:20, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's silly to accuse American sites containing the word "doujinshi" of being more porn-focused than Japanese websites or alternative spellings, without doing a good comparison of the two sets of results. But I agree with your "scholarly reference" thing, so I guess it can be kept this way for at least another year or so.
And what we need here is a larger Internet. Ashibaka (tock) 22:25, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Jimbo Wales to Attend San Diego Meetup on October 18 2005

[edit]

Hello, Jimbo Wales will be in San Diego to attend OOPSLA and has agreed to come by and visit with the San Diego wikipedians. If you are interested, you will find more info on my talk page. Johntex\talk 00:54, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please check your WP:NA entry

[edit]

Greetings, editor! Your name appears on Wikipedia:List of non-admins with high edit counts. If you have not done so lately, please take a look at that page and check your listing to be sure that following the particulars are correct:

  1. If you are an admin, please remove your name from the list.
  2. If you are currently interested in being considered for adminship, please be sure your name is in bold; if you are opposed to being considered for adminship, please cross out your name (but do not delete it, as it will automatically be re-added in the next page update).
  3. Please check to see if you are in the right category for classification by number of edits.

Thank you, and have a wiki wiki day! BD2412 T 04:12, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

request

[edit]

hi DopefishJustin, you helped edit once the Kimono article. There is a slight dispute going on about the Talk:Junihitoe, maybe you care to share some input? with kind regards... Gryffindor 18:10, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Thats why we have more than one pair of eyes looking at things. I didn't see the one tiny line of italic text at the bottom. Usually my checks for copyvios are "Uhh the very first edit of this article looks kind of polished... *cuts and pastes the first line of text into google*". --Syrthiss 03:29, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Solomon picture

[edit]

Hmm...the picture was taken on my camera by someone else. To whom does the copyright belong? AdamSolomon 02:11, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Probably the person who took the photo, unless it was like a handoff to a stranger or something. You're probably OK just licensing it yourself. The important part is that it's not ineligible for copyright so it shouldn't be tagged as such. DopefishJustin 15:57, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Language tag for hanja fields

[edit]

On your tagging of character fields to show Korean variants:

I think User:IGEL did that earlier in the English Wikipedia after we had already done the same thing a lot in the German WP last year. However, if I remember correctly, he said the community rejected it for some reason (I don't see how there should be anything wrong with it), so don't be surprised if the same happens to your edits. Wikipeditor 21:27, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Conversions to UTF-8 - Please, don't do them!!!

[edit]

Hi! For heaven's sake, please, revert all the changes you have done through AWB :-( They are a nightmare for maintainers, as many distinct characters are rendered in the same way or not depending on the font you use. And this means that many errors in the articles source code become virtually undetectable!!! --Gennaro Prota 22:33, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a specific page that you disagree with the changes on, let me know and I might change it back (or you could do it yourself), but generally the maintainability of the page is improved due to not having to puzzle out inscrutable character numbers. If you really need to distinguish which character codes are being used (which is rarely necessary), copy and paste into a real Unicode editor like BabelPad. This has already been discussed in more detail at User talk:Curpsbot-unicodify; since Wikipedia started using UTF-8 some time ago, all edits where people just type Unicode characters are going to come out as UTF-8 and not HTML codes so there's not much point in preserving them in old pages. DopefishJustin 22:43, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have a number of pages related to punctuation in my watch list. I would say all of them benefit from having the character references. Suppose for instance on your machine, with the fonts and the browser you use etc., the typewriter apostrophe (U+0027) and the punctuation apostrophe (U+2019) are rendered the same way (quite likely): you'll never detect if someone typed one instead of the other in the edit box! With the numeric references instead you see at least that they are different and that both are rendered as apostrophes. Granted, in some cases the numeric reference is a non-sense (example: '°F', you can directly type that), but in many others they are much better than having the hard-coded glyph. For an example, look at the revert I did here on April 15: to see what the character typed by Wikipeditor actually was I had to paste it into an editor and decode it! Weren't the page in my watch list I would have never noticed the error. Believe me, I'm not a newbie as it concerns maintenance issues. --Gennaro Prota 00:07, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, I would be careful. See this example for a clear apostrophe problem that makes the text bold if numeric references aren't used: Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser#Serious unicodify problem. --J. J. 14:26, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That's why I vet every change before allowing AWB to make it. I specifically don't change markup-sensitive characters like apostrophes, ampersands, and greater-than and less-than signs. DopefishJustin 00:35, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greek script

[edit]

Thank you for all your efforts in implementing proper Greek script! I'll try to do the same from now on. Best regards PHG 10:23, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Allegations of sock puppetry on the Center for Science in the Public Interest page

[edit]

Allegations of sock puppetry have been made against some of the accounts that have edited the Center for Science in the Public Interest page. I have instigated the wiki process for handling such allegations. See Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/David Justin. As someone who has contributed to the CSPI page, please add your views to the Comments section. You have up to 10 days to make comments on the allegation. Nunquam Dormio 19:19, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, apologies for deleting your vandalised contributions. This was actually a manual reversion, i.e. not using VP, but the vandalism had been complicated by your subsequent edit (to restore previous vandalism ...), which I too hastily decided was a part-revert of the multiple edits by various I.P's, when in fact it actually related to edits made on 26th October. In future I will be more careful in these situations. Again apologies, and let's hope your contribution is here to stay this time. --apers0n 22:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What's with your Jan. 6, 2006 edit? I see a bunch of question marks in the first sentence. Clarityfiend 03:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A long time before that edit, I added Darius' name in Old Persian cuneiform (i.e. the way he would have spelled it himself), because Old Persian had just been added to Unicode and I thought it would be a cool way to try it out. Of course, cuneiform fonts don't come with Windows so most people don't have any installed and they just see question marks instead. To complicate matters further, since cuneiform is little-used, it's located in an extended area of Unicode called Plane 1, but a lot of (especially older) software doesn't support anything but Plane 0 (which has most of the alphabets etc. used by modern languages). An anonymous user with such software had edited the article here and inadvertently corrupted the cuneiform into gibberish Greek letters (from Plane 0). I didn't notice until Jan. 6, 2006, at which point I replaced it with the correct Plane 1 characters again. DopefishJustin 05:11, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Copyeditor's Barnstar

[edit]
The Copyeditor's Barnstar
I award you this Copyeditor's Barnstar Barnstar for your prolific work helping to improve the Anabolic steroid page. Congratulations Wikidudeman (talk) 04:19, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bubblegum Crisis anomalocarid.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bubblegum Crisis anomalocarid.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:00, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

radiation hormesis

[edit]

I just posted something back at Radiation hormesis regarding your recent edit. Specifically, I ask why have a section on cadmium at all.Pdbailey 21:36, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Normalization of Greek text

[edit]

Hello DopefishJustin. Thank you for all your work on Asian history article! Are you sure though that putting all Greek coin legends in lowercase letters is the right thing to do? I tend to prefer uppercase letters, because this is what is used on the coins, and thus makes it easier for a reader to decipher the coins. Also many people are not familiar with Greek lowercase letters. I would appreciate your comments on the subject. Best regards. PHG 10:06, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your answer. Indeed, coin publications tend to keep uppercase as in here. I take you point though for people names (Alexander). I suggest we revert to uppercase for the coin legends only. Best regards. PHG 11:18, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:3drealms.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:3drealms.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Freedomeagle 13:48, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Corporate logo of Apogee Software, Ltd. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Freedomeagle 13:49, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tetrachlorodecaoxide

[edit]

Thankyou for the corrections! Almazi 19:41, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot!

[edit]

Hi, thanks for your comments on my editing the Mycenean Language article. Gakrivas 08:29, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Action 52 (Unl) (E) 8.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Action 52 (Unl) (E) 8.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 12:19, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You placed a convert-IPA tag on the talk page, but it looks like all of the pronunciation in the article is currently in IPA. Okay to remove the tag? Thanks. Michael Z. 2008-05-30 06:05 z

Simonides

[edit]

Please delete this article, then. I certainly made use of the content of the material from the Times article -- which is why I linked to it -- although I thought that I simply gave the facts, rather than copied verbatim. But clearly I didn't do enough. No doubt someone else can write an article in a few years on this person. Roger Pearse 13:17, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

I have decided to write an article, because it is connected with Codex Sinaiticus - it is my field, and my interest - but during editing I discovered, there was another article on this subject. It was even in Wikipedia:WikiProject British crime/Wanted Articles, I did not know that. My first purpose was only to write a short article on this subject, but now I have discovered more sources, even article of Simonides from 13 September 1862 in the Guardian (it is in internet). It means the article can be expand. But not now, because tomorrow I will have vacations. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 15:34, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Img 2788.jpg

[edit]

File:Img 2788.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Da Qin Pagoda.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Da Qin Pagoda.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 18:41, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Somari.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Somari.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NanohaA'sYuriTalk, My master 00:02, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirection for Yunus

[edit]

I have changed the redirection for the page Yunus, and placed comments in the talk page for it. I see that you reverted the last change to redirection to this a couple of years ago, can we discuss on that page if you still feel the need to revert again? YojimboSan (talk) 00:29, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vancouver Wikipedia 10th Anniversary Meetup

[edit]

This article, to which you have contributed, has been nominated for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waita Uziga. Robofish (talk) 00:00, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Soumen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Redtigerxyz Talk 20:08, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Corporate logo of Apogee Software, Ltd.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Corporate logo of Apogee Software, Ltd.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:16, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Commander Keen in Goodbye Galaxy title screen.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Commander Keen in Goodbye Galaxy title screen.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:32, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dopefish for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dopefish is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dopefish until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. czar 02:06, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, DopefishJustin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, DopefishJustin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing Roman characters in Greek Words...

[edit]

I'm currently doing a search for [Α-Ω][A-Z]|[A-Z][Α-Ω] to try to find places where roman letters are used incorrectly. I'm still finding a lot of things like Δ Τ, (without the space) which are correct, but I'm also finding a *lot* of places where they do need to be fixed. When I get down to the ones that I'm unsure of, could I use you as a resource? Note, currently I keep a tab open to the sigma, so that I can copy the Lunate sigma in place of C.Naraht (talk) 20:45, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'm on here somewhat infrequently these days, though. DopefishJustin (talk) 18:57, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chip's Challenge.png listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chip's Challenge.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob13Talk 18:08, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Huǒ lóng guǒ listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Huǒ lóng guǒ. Since you had some involvement with the Huǒ lóng guǒ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 01:18, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, DopefishJustin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bareknuckle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:39, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, DopefishJustin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, DopefishJustin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"3D animation" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 3D animation and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 8#3D animation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 08:52, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]