Talk:Price gouging
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 23 March 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kguth.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
no such thing - this is a political term
[edit]price gouging is clearly a political term invented to demonize the basic functions of a free market. when supply falls, price has to increase to prevent shortages. econ 101. those who do not believe in econ 101 invent various terms to undermine basic functions of a free economy because "muh feels". notice that the definition says price gouging is when a price goes higher to what is "reasonable" or "fair". what on earth is that? who decides what is reasonable and fair? Corn9090 (talk) 01:40, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- Price gouging is crime/civil wrong in many jurisdictions. As such, it is a legal concept and is rightly included in Wikipedia. It may be political in the sense that various governments may have policies related to this. But ultimately, the concept is the subject of multiple pieces of legislation and is therefore a legitimate concept regardless of how any given person may feel about particular policies or laws related to it. Tojasonharris (talk) 05:23, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Worldwide view flag
[edit]Hi all! I made additions to the article to include related regulation in the UK and EU in order to demonstrate the range in anti-competition efforts. I would appreciate feedback on whether more edits should be made or if it is appropriate to remove the "worldwide view" flag. Thank you! Jessg724 (talk) 15:05, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
- I actually added a new section before I noticed yours. My original comment was: "This article is too focused on one country and needs to be expanded to include a broader focus and de-localised. Tojasonharris (talk) 05:19, 14 June 2022 (UTC)." I think the page is still very much in need of this flag. Tojasonharris (talk) 05:27, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- Given the term is mostly used in the US, I do not think the flag is warranted anymore. I moved it to the Covid-19 section that only has US examples Superb Owl (talk) 21:42, 17 August 2024 (UTC)