Talk:Computer science
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Computer science article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 180 days ![]() |
![]() | Informatics Practices was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 9 September 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Computer science on 7 October 2018. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Computer science was copied or moved into Computer science education with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Should we prioritize (move up) Applied Computer Science from Artificial Intelligence?
[edit]In the field sections, Artificial Intelligence is on 4.3, above Applied Computer Science (4.4). Should we swap their positions?
The numerical category might be just arbitrary, but I feel like Applied Computer Science should be right next to Theoretical Computer Science down, and Computer Systems could be dropped down too. So there's like a sense or prioritization.
Artificial Intelligence seems to be a more recently development in computer science, so it could be the last on the list. Ejenriquez (talk) 01:32, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Done. I also moved § Artificial intelligence into § Applied computer science, because it seemed weird as the only top-level area. Freoh (talk) 01:44, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Reverts
[edit]@NotPeterParker:, if you have any questions about your proposed changes or would like to discuss further to gain consensus, please post here.
If I understand your concern correctly, you may be mixing up automaton with automation. From citation 3: "The discipline of computing is the systematic study of algorithmic processes that describe and transform information, their theory, analysis, design, efficiency, implementation, and application. The fundamental question underlying all of computing is, 'What can be (efficiently) automated?'"
Best, Caleb Stanford (talk) 23:17, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 23 April 2024 (2)
[edit]![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hamoodyshal1 (talk) 15:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Berger E (2017) Csrankings: Computer science rankings. http://csrankings.org, accessed: 2017-05-01
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. —Bagumba (talk) 16:29, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Computer science page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Computer science" page.
- C-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-3 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Technology
- C-Class level-3 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-3 vital articles in Technology
- C-Class vital articles in Technology
- C-Class Computer science articles
- Top-importance Computer science articles
- WikiProject Computer science articles
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists