Talk:TurboGrafx-16
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the TurboGrafx-16 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "TurboGrafx-16" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:51, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
id like for the pc engine and tg16 articles to be seperated
[edit]not everyone lives in america first thing first, japanese pce and western tg16 are nearly two years apart and drasticaly different game libraries, not unlike famicom and nes ZacharyFDS/Memphis1525 (talk) 04:33, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- We don't have separate articles for the NES and Famicom, so I do not see how that supports your proposal. We don't have separate articles for any systems based on their having different names in different markets, nor do we separate based on some games for the system being released in some markets and not others. The fact that the PC Engine was a success in Japan and the TurboGrafx less so in the US is not a reason to split the either. I'm sorry, but I see nothing that supports the splitting of the article. oknazevad (talk) 05:02, 22 July 2024 (UTC)