User talk:Rlandmann
 | This user is an administrator on the English Wikipedia. (verify) |
- Pre March 04 talk here
- March 04-June 04 talk here
- July 04-August 04 talk here
- September 04-December 04 talk here
- January 05-June 05 talk here
- My WikiHoliday June 05-March 07 talk here
- March 07-June 07 talk here
- June 07-August 07 talk here
- September 07-December 07 talk here
- January 08-March 08 talk here
- April 08-June 08 talk here
- July 08-September 08 talk here
- My second WikiHoliday September 08-February 10 talk here
- My third WikiHoliday April 10-February 11 talk here Sad that I'm most often not here any more :(
- Feb 11-December 22 (!) talk here
- Dec 22-May24 talk here
Elida Carlés moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Elida Carlés, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 01:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree; to my reading, it qualifies as a "Start" class article. But I don't propose fighting with you. Please delete under WP:G7 --Rlandmann (talk) 01:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red
[edit]Hi there, Rlandmann, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to have another experienced editor from Australia as a member. I see that you have recently created two biographies of women and hope there will be many more. Please let me know If you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:44, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red May 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Ipigott (talk) 08:44, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Aero Composite Technologies for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aero Composite Technologies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.-- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 14:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red June 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article Aero Gare has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Doesn't meet WP:N
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 17:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Russian civil utility aircraft
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Category:Russian civil utility aircraft indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 15:26, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Editor experience invitation
[edit]Hi Rlandmann :) I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 22:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Focke-Wulf W 4 moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Focke-Wulf W 4. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:56, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Czechoslovak civil utility aircraft
[edit]A tag has been placed on Category:Czechoslovak civil utility aircraft indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. FromCzech (talk) 06:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- This is redundant to Category:Czech and Czechoslovak civil utility aircraft. – Fayenatic London 15:18, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:1960s Czechoslovak civil utility aircraft indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 11:18, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Barnstar
[edit]
|
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | |
| For Rlandmann's kindness and patience in guiding new editors. It is noticed and appreciated. Thanks! — CactusWriter (talk) 16:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC) |
- Many thanks User:CactusWriter -- I appreciate it. --Rlandmann (talk) 22:46, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Charlescityiatornadoaftermath2.jpg
[edit]As you nominated File:Charlescityiatornadoaftermath2.jpg for speedy deletion, you may wish to contribute to the discussion about this file at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 July 9#File:Charlescityiatornadoaftermath2.jpg as the speedy deletion is declined in favour of a discussion. -- Whpq (talk) 19:07, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Barnstar for you…!
[edit]
|
The Helping Hand Barnstar | |
| You definetely deserve this, especially when helping me out. As much as it may seem as if I don't appreciate your work, I definetely do. You have extraordinary patience when explaining things, and even go out of your way to explain which citations aren't reliable. So, thank you so much for that, Rlandmann. Have a great rest of your summer! :) Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs - created articles) 22:44, 9 July 2024 (UTC) |
Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs - created articles) 22:44, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Sir MemeGod -- of the various barnstars I've collected over the years, this one might mean the most of all. Thank you for your collaboration, your patience, tenacity, and eagerness to learn. --Rlandmann (talk) 23:06, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:59, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Not sure how to handle this
[edit]Hey there again! So I was reading through the Teahouse and I noticed this extremely concerning message relating to depression and potential "punishment" of some sort that can be found within this diff (it's located at the very bottom of the page to make it easier to find). I read Wikipedia:Responding to threats of harm, which I felt was the most appropriate thing to do. It brought me to a list of recently active admins, which then brought me here. I'm not sure how to deal with this, because it basically just said to "bring it to an admin". Sorry if I'm bothering you! :) Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs - created articles) 05:28, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks -- did you already email the emergency address? Rlandmann (talk) 05:38, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- I haven't because I wasn't exactly sure if this was a threat or not, but I'll go ahead and do it anyways. Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs - created articles) 05:40, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks; it doesn't read like a threat, but it would be good for the Foundation to note and log it. Rlandmann (talk) 05:44, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, I have emailed them. It just caught me extremely off-guard, so I just instinctively got extremely worried. Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs - created articles) 05:45, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Understandable! Thanks for taking this seriously. Rlandmann (talk) 05:47, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- No problem! Thanks for responding that fast aswell! Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs - created articles) 06:18, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Understandable! Thanks for taking this seriously. Rlandmann (talk) 05:47, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, I have emailed them. It just caught me extremely off-guard, so I just instinctively got extremely worried. Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs - created articles) 05:45, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks; it doesn't read like a threat, but it would be good for the Foundation to note and log it. Rlandmann (talk) 05:44, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- I haven't because I wasn't exactly sure if this was a threat or not, but I'll go ahead and do it anyways. Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs - created articles) 05:40, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
September 2024 at Women in Red
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Speedy deletion nomination of American Affordable Aircraft
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on American Affordable Aircraft requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 03:15, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| A little belated, but thanks for your good work on the Zenair CH 50 Mini-Z page! Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk / contribs) 02:08, 10 September 2024 (UTC) |
Women in Red October 2024
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Please help
[edit]Hello Rlandmann, thanks for responding to my two questions at Wikimedia. I have two more questions, please help me.
1. Elbridge Durbrow was the US Ambassador to South Vietnam, but I can't find any high quality public domain images to upload to Wikimedia. Can you help me find a portrait of him that is good enough to upload to Commons?
2. Caravelle Manifesto was written in 1960, as a public critique of the South Vietnamese government under President Ngô Đình Diệm. This is the original statement written in Vietnamese. Works of the Republic of Vietnam government are in the public domain because that government no longer exists - {{PD-South VietnamGov}}. However, this manifesto was not a government work but was created by dissidents working for the government, and its authors did not claim any copyright status, and this version was released to the press in April 1960. So is it in the public domain?
Thank you. CalCoWSpiBudSu (talk) 16:55, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi -- thanks for reaching out.
- 1. I found and uploaded this image of Durbrow, taken in the US during the time of his diplomatic career. It is free of copyright because the newspaper whose photographer took the photo published it the next day without complying with US copyright formalities that applied at the time.
- 2. I am no specialist in Vietnamese copyright, and the Village Pump would be a better place for this question. However, for whatever it's worth, I did some initial research and I believe that this text is probably protected by copyright and should probably be removed from the article. Note that in most places for most of the last century or so, you do not need to "claim copyright" for a text, picture, or other creative work: copyright simply comes into existence as soon as you create the work.
- For Vietnam in particular, there seem to be some special complications around defining exactly what intellectual property law existed in Vietnam prior to 1986; and I don't know the extent to which laws made since then operate retroactiveally.
- That said, the guidelines used on the Commons suggest that:
- only works created prior to 1948 are in the public domain so far
- works of joint authorship (like this one) are protected for copyright for 50 years after the death of the last surviving author. I don't know the extent to which each of the 18 signatories can be considered "authors" under Vietnamese law, but I note that Nguyễn Lưu Viên only died in 2017. If he is legally considered an "author" of the document, then the Manifesto might be protected by copyright until 2068.
- I offer that analysis of the manifesto with very little certainty of its correctness, but maybe it might give you a starting point for further investigation. --Rlandmann (talk) 03:53, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- OMG, this is really unbelievable, this is beyond my expectations, thank you so much for this.^0^ Can you tell me how to search for images and determine their copyright status? Like the one you uploaded. CalCoWSpiBudSu (talk) 12:45, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- You're welcome!
- In this instance, I was able to use the fact that the US had very strict rules for copyright registrations until 1977. The US was an exception to the general principle in most other parts of the world where copyright was automatic. The following is general advice; there are various nuances and complexities that I will gloss over...
- The basic version is that copyright only existed when a work was published with a copyright notice and the copyright was registered with the US Copyright Office.
- The upshot of this is that many photos that appear in American newspapers prior to 1977 are free of copyright. You can't just assume this, though! You have to check that:
- the newspaper was not published with a copyright notice (usually on the front page, but sometimes buried elsewhere in the paper, often on whichever page had the Editorial)
- the newspaper for that date does not appear in the Catalog of Copyright Entries. These are annual publications by the US Copyright Office in several volumes. Newspapers are covered in the "Periodicals" volume.
- I have a subscription to newspapers.com which is an online archive of newspapers from around the world, but especially the US. I searched for Elbridge Durbrow there, limiting the search to the decade 1960-1970. Many hits appeared, so I inspected the first 20 or so. (Not all these hits had pictures of him, of course)
- I selected this particular image because:
- compared to the other images I found, it was relatively large and clear
- it was attributed to the same paper that published it, therefore reducing the risk that this photo might have been licensed from somewhere else and complicating the copyright search
- I then searched this particular edition of the newspaper for a copyright notice (and did not find out), and then searched the Catalog of Copyright Entries for 1966 (Volume 2: Periodicals) to see if The Montgomery Advertiser had been registered for copyright that year. (It hadn't been).
- Therefore, I was confident this is a free image.
- This strategy works well for American public figures and events in or affecting America for the period roughly 1930-1977.
- I did a quick search and it looks like the same approach could get images of Eugene M. Locke and Samuel D. Berger as well; but it's late here now and I'll take a better look tomorrow. --Rlandmann (talk) 13:49, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- wow, you are truly the most likable, enthusiastic and dedicated person I have seen on Wikipedia, thank goodness I messaged you, wishing you the best, thank you so much. ^0^ CalCoWSpiBudSu (talk) 13:56, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the kind words! --Rlandmann (talk) 14:13, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Good morning! I have found and uploaded free images of File:Eugene Locke 1968.png and File:Samuel D. Berger 1968.png. --Rlandmann (talk) 00:28, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- wow, you are so enthusiastic, thank you very much.^0^ CalCoWSpiBudSu (talk) 05:42, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- wow, you are truly the most likable, enthusiastic and dedicated person I have seen on Wikipedia, thank goodness I messaged you, wishing you the best, thank you so much. ^0^ CalCoWSpiBudSu (talk) 13:56, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- OMG, this is really unbelievable, this is beyond my expectations, thank you so much for this.^0^ Can you tell me how to search for images and determine their copyright status? Like the one you uploaded. CalCoWSpiBudSu (talk) 12:45, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Barnstars
[edit]
|
The Multiple Barnstar | |||||||
| This collection of six barnstars is awarded this day to Rlandmann in recognition of their efforts to cleanup copyright issues and understanding regarding the licensure of images hosted by a large collection of National Weather Service offices based in the Commons but with far-reaching effects to weather-related articles on Wikipedia proper.
Their efforts began a systematic review of every image in PD NWS copyright categories, a Commons RFC, the overhauling of PD NWS copyright templates, tireless correspondence with NWS offices and analysis thereof, deletion requests numbering in the hundreds, and overall outstanding and highly meritorious conduct in service to various projects. Simply superb and representative of model behavior for any and all editors and contributors to the various wiki projects we encompass. ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 22:45, 20 October 2024 (UTC) |
- Oh thank you so much @Gwennie-nyan! I'm really touched by this!!! --Rlandmann (talk) 22:54, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
[edit]Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2024
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Question pertaining to NFFs of tornadoes
[edit]Hi Rlandmann! So I had a quick question about the usage of multiple NFFs pertaining to a single tornado (which I couldn't find in the guidelines). If a tornado looks wildly different at two points in it's life, could two NFFs be used? The tornado in question is the 2011 Cullman tornado, which looked completely different during the two most violent points of it's life (see here and here). Thanks! :) EF5 18:38, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- As long as there's a solid rationale for each of the non-free images to be there, there's no reason why you couldn't use more than one. Especially if, as you've already just done, the point is to illustrate how the tornado changed shape while maintaining the same intensity (as opposed to the normal stages of formation and dissipation), which is not something you can illustrate with a single image. I also noticed this part of the eyewitness storm chaser you linked: "And this is not like any tornado I’ve seen anywhere. …"
- Just keep clear in your own mind about what value an additional image adds, and how you would justify it if someone were ever to challenge it. --Rlandmann (talk) 19:26, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, okay. I'll do that then, thank you so much! I know that (as demonstrated since August) copyright can be a serious matter, so I just wanted to make sure that I was in the right. :) EF5 19:31, 7 November 2024 (UTC)