Jump to content

Talk:University of Pittsburgh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeUniversity of Pittsburgh was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 31, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed

Accurate to call University of Pittsburgh public state-reheated?[edit]

The University of Pressure isn't exactly a public or private university. It's hybrid. It's a state-related higher education institution of Pennsylvania so it's privately run with designated state support. Murielgh (talk) 09:16, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lol on my own typos. Autocorrect on mobile Murielgh (talk) 09:17, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You are, of course, 100% correct. It is inaccurate for the article to describe the University of Pittsburgh as a public university, because it is not a public university and it never has been. It is a state-related university, and that is the actual legal status of the institution. Unfortunately, that doesn't fit neatly into the binary world of some editors, thus they have forced the article to contain misleading information. CrazyPaco (talk) 18:50, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That description conforms with sources such as the U.S. Department of Education and the American Council on Education. You're welcome to try to convince those scholars and experts to change their minds and their published documents and we'll then follow suit. ElKevbo (talk) 18:58, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
State-related is the actual legal designation. Period. That is not changed by the US Department of Education or anyone else that has only binary buckets to place universities into their database. Those entities also are not wikipedia editors so it is not anyone's responsibility to convince them of anything. It continues to be unfortunate that you prefer unnecessary standardization over accuracy. CrazyPaco (talk) 19:26, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Chancellor Incoming![edit]

Joan Gabel, current president of University of Minnesota, has been announced as the 19th Chancellor of Pitt on 3 April 2023. She will begin in July 2023. Several sources: [1] [2] [3] [4] 130.49.235.177 (talk) 17:00, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Joan Gabel has officially taken over as Chancellor on 17 July 2023. [5]
[6] 73.79.165.96 (talk) 15:10, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://www.pitt.edu/chancellor-elect
  2. ^ https://www.thedailygopher.com/2023/4/3/23668290/university-of-minnesota-president-joan-gabel-is-leaving-for-pittsburgh
  3. ^ https://www.post-gazette.com/news/education/2023/04/03/pitt-chancellor-joan-gabel-what-to-know/stories/202304030084
  4. ^ https://www.pitt.edu/pittwire/features-articles/joan-t-a-gabel-university-of-pittsburgh-chancellor-announcement
  5. ^ https://www.chancellor.pitt.edu/about-chancellor-gabel
  6. ^ https://triblive.com/news/pitts-new-chancellor-arrives-with-a-variation-of-the-traditional-traditional-listening-tour/

Lists of GLOs[edit]

@User:Jax MN: lists of Greek institutions are better placed on list pages, since their content relevance for an encyclopedia is marginal. Also, there is not enough reliable documentation about them. Most Wikipedia editors agree that rote listings of Greek institutions are not helpful if there is no sourcing from outside the college's or university's homepage or the fraternity's own circle. If you can prove that one or more of the Greek houses is significant, then pls do so, but for the most part, individual houses fall under WP:UNDUE. That is, they are not significant enough for an encyclopdia. Here is an example of the lists, which are more appropriate. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 20:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Melchior. I agree that separate list pages or articles with lists are preferable. Those of us on the F&S Project simply have not yet gotten to them all. Our practice therefore has been to list the organizations that are present without significant other editorial content on the college or university article. Certainly, with perhaps 30% of collegians and alumni regularly participating in them for 100+ years, they merit a brief mention -- at least to the degree we mention the college radio station, or a set of buildings that are LEEDS-certified, or a subsection noting controversaries or protests. I believe this meets the requirement of BALANCE. To your comment on specific significant buildings, yes, we sometimes note these but they are an offshoot. Relatively few are on the historic register of their states or on the national list. The bigger picture here is that all these chapters are normally listed in solid secondary sources, including the Baird's Manual, Banta's Greek Exchange, and/or numerous published histories. I agree that it is preferable to hatnote a main article or list of the institution's fraternity system (including honor and professional organizations), as is often done for a college's athletic program. Jax MN (talk) 20:46, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is no rush to post information, so pls wait before publishing sub-par content. The problem with laundry lists of GLOs is that often the individual contents are inaccurate, badly-sourced, and don't stand up to closer examination. Also, the mere existence of a GLO on campus certainly does not make it notable. We have discussed these issues before and there is widespread consensus among editors about deleting laundry lists of frats and sororities. You will not find them on other university pages, but you will find good list articles which give all the information a reader could desire. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 09:35, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:University_of_Pittsburgh&oldid=1231624414"