Talk:World economy
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the World economy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
GDP[edit]
GDP numbers (PPP), (currency), during 2003. $50.4 trillion, per person that's $8000(50.4/0.0063).
Per capita GDP growth rates: [1] set the 1950 PPP GDP at $6.8 trillion, [2] set the population at 2,555,360,972, that makes the per capita GDP $2,661 in 1950, compared with 2003 there's a 201% increase, that's 2.1% a year (2661*x^53=8000).
Since 1993s $6,599 (36.5/5,531,014,635) it's 1.9% a year (6599*1.9^10=8000). As a comparison, the IMF database put the PPP GDP at $30 trillion during 1993 ([3]), that's $5,424 per person (30/5.531). That's a 4.0% per year growth rate (5424*1.04^10=8000) - Jerryseinfeld 00:38, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
More China[edit]
Yes, I noticed the discrepency about China, too. Wikipedia's article on largest economies, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_world%27s_largest_economies
lists China as the sixth largest, while this article says it is second. This may be due to difficulty in measuring China's economy. Does anyone have a source we can quote? Carax 02:51, 8 July 2005 (UTC)
Import / export numbers are totally fucked up[edit]
- # Yearly exports: $1.1 trillion (f.o.b., 2002 est.)
- # Yearly imports: $2.5 trillion (f.o.b., 2002 est.)
These two numbers are by definition exactly equal. Actually, due to various accounting issues they might differ by a few %, but this is just ridiculous.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.173.120.104 (talk) 05:52, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:51, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
Sector summary[edit]
Do we need a table like this?
Sector | Asia | Africa | North America | South America | Europe | Oceania | World |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aerospace & Defense | |||||||
Automotive | |||||||
Chemicals | |||||||
Construction | |||||||
Consumer Staples | |||||||
Financial Services | |||||||
Food | |||||||
Health Care | |||||||
Home Construction | |||||||
Industrials | |||||||
Leisure Goods | |||||||
Media | |||||||
Mining | |||||||
Pharmaceuticals | |||||||
Real Estate | |||||||
Support Services | |||||||
Telecomms | |||||||
Travel & Leisure | |||||||
Utilities |
92.71.60.62 (talk) 10:18, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Use sectors per Industry Classification Benchmark? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.71.60.61 (talk) 14:13, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- B-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class Globalization articles
- Top-importance Globalization articles
- B-Class Economics articles
- Top-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles