Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2005 February 19

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 19

[edit]

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Pending deletion; block compress error. Joyous 03:14, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC)

Delete - Does not appear to be notable. There is a website and Google only produced links to that website.Ganymead 04:40, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)

  • As this made it through VfD without a single vote other than the nominator, I'm relisting it. —Korath (Talk) 17:18, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. In my opinion, this is not quite at the bar for notability, being strictly a local SIG. I'm open to arguments to the contrary or counter-examples of prior concensus. HyperZonktalk 18:17, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:16, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not enough notability. Zzyzx11 00:17, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not notable. --CDN99 16:16, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.