Jump to content

User talk:FafnerAzugon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello FafnerAzugon and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

Good luck!

Hey there, you're not the Fafner, are you? moink 18:06, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

No I'm not. Fafner 09:23, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Actually, I checked, and he's actually Fafnir. Anyway, welcome to Wikipedia! moink 14:45, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The difference of the name is not really important as "Fafner" and "Fafnir" are quite the same character; it is mostly a matter of pronunciation according to various languages I think. Just have a look at the article Fafner ;-) Anyway, thanks for the welcome :-) Fafner 08:09, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Dear Fafner,

[edit]

I'm guessing by your programming credentials that you have an elaborate computer set up. The reason I'm interested is because I've created a Virtual classroom for Wikipedians to learn, teach, and share advanced wiki-skills. I was wondereing if you would like to stop by and take a look. Right now the participants are engaged in a show and tell of their user interfaces (the tools we use to navigate and work on Wikipedia, including programs, extensions, scripts, settings, etc.). I hope you'll drop in to share and compare. Interiot, Rich Farmbrough, and CBDunkerson have been kind enough to help get things started by describing the interfaces they use. User:Interiot has even completed a new Firefox extension to make navigating Wikipedia easier. It is available in the announcements section on the Virtual classroom page.  The Transhumanist   12:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WTF???

[edit]

Who the hell are you???

Why are you stalking me???--71.203.147.175 21:22, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with an anonymous user

[edit]

Hello, I am not sure where to put this, but it seems an appropriate place ;-)

I am having some troubles with an anonymous user here, who considers that tezukainenglish.com [1] isn't a valid source for the article. His/her argument for supporting that seems dubious to me ("a stupid website, where people go to argue about garbage on their tiny little forums"), and he/she doesn't counter my argument ("tezukainenglish.com is in my opinion a valid source, at least not more or less that the non-official websites pointed by the other links that you didn't remove").

I would happily continue to undo his/her edits, but I am not interested in waging an edit war (essentially for technical reasons: an edit war uselessly eats up a lot of space in the database).

Now that I have accepted a pause to decide about that, the user doesn't move, maybe because the article is presently in the state he/she wishes, maybe because his/her IP address has been blocked, or for some other reason. I feel that by putting back the link I will start the whole process again.

Would you have some advices for a humble user who tries to do the best, face to an anonymous user who may try to do the best too? :-)

Fafner 21:53, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When in a disagreement, be sure to refer to the relevant policies and guidelines. In this case, Wikipedia:External links. The external links section isn't for source citations. It is for further resources of interest to readers of the subject. It's an extra See also section that points to destinations outside of Wikipedia. The Transhumanist    17:58, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you...

[edit]

... for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. May you have a very happy New Year! Yunshui  00:04, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

[edit]

23:50, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, FafnerAzugon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, FafnerAzugon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]